>>You've disregarded explanations and examples and quotes and actions and court rulings and patterns of behavior, etc etc

On the rare occasion that you provide examples and quotes and actions and court rulings, I try to respond directly. Disagreeing with your interpretation is not disregarding.

>> so my "explanations" or anyone else's are pointless, which is why I'm not explaining this to you anymore -

If an explanation is "a reason or justification given for an action or belief" then your explanations boil down to others being stupid or lousy human beings, which in the end is your explanation for any dissent from your decrees. If you're going to stop doing that, then good.

>> plus all that leads me to think you're simply trying to stir up arguments.

With respect, the "stirring up" comes from the person who bursts in with belligerent decrees and disparagements that he can't substantiate or (worse) just keeps repeating even when rebutted.