>>>Look when you clearly know the difference between me saying I think a person's decision is stupid vs calling a person stupid - you're misinterpreting and misrepresenting what I've said - and obviously doing it on purpose because it IS so clear - for no other reason other than to stir up an argument on something that doesn't even exist. As I said I'm tired of explaining things to you that you already know just because you just want to start sh_it.
>
>So I'm the one paraphrasing, to victimize you?

No - you're completely misstating what I said - and you know it. I have not called you or anyone else on this forum names.

>Well, what should happen now, is that rather than calling you an idiot, a looser buffoon, or stupid and/or a bigot of some sort- which in case you forget, are examples of yesterday's batch of personal attacks- I should produce evidence of your calling people names. But I'm happy to let it go if we agree that personal attacks and calling people names, are not proofs or explanations of anything except lack of valid argument.
>
>Meanwhile we'll know shortly whether Moore is a senator or not.
>
>And now Bill O'Reilly says that there's a well-funded campaign to go after Trump for sexual impropriety in January... and that he has a tape of a lawyer offering somebody $200K to claim Trump molested them.
>
>My take: if it's true, then every concocted or overblown claim just makes it harder for women who really were molested. Much more of this Allredization and it'll be a modern-day version of the girl who cried Wolf.