>>>No - you're completely misstating what I said - and you know it. I have not called you or anyone else on this forum names.
>
>It's not limited to the forum: you regularly call American and Alabama voters idiots and just yesterday you labeled me stupid and/or a bigot over an outrageous straw man list you pretended I might disagree with. 2 examples from yesterday's batch:
>
>VA>>The idiots in Alabama would rather have an homophobic racist alleged sexual predator that's been thrown off the bench not once but twice, not to mention a slew of other issues, than a ...OMG...a democrat! What a bunch of looser buffoons.
>
>My contention was that your explanation for events is that others are idiots or deficient human beings. Voila.
>
>Yesterday, in response to questions about grounds for the personal attacks on Moore:
>
>VA>>Let me lay it out for you one last time:
>VA>>1. Racism is bad
>VA>>2. Racists should not be elected officials.
>VA>>3. Prejudices against homosexuals is bad.
>VA>>4. Prejudicial people should not be elected officials.
>VA>>5. Sexual predators are bad.
>VA>>6. Sexual predators should not be elected officials.
>
>VA>>7. If you don't understand of believe 1 though 6 then you are either stupid and/or a bigot of some sort. It doesn't have a damn thing to do with winning or loosing an election or the DNC or anything else --- that is my point.
>
>I don't want to belabor the obvious, but many would find this domineering diction offensive and derogatory. It's outrageous to pretend people might disagree with those truisms and it's a totally transparent vehicle for the name calling that follows. No doubt it can be loudly protested that it's only true if people don't "understand of believe" the list- but it's a personal attack to even suggest anytbody here might not understand or agree with such a list. There's nothing new or clever about this sort of tactic that is intended to put somebody on the defensive rather than responding to their point. As a debating style it's absolutely disgraceful, but it collapses if the target remains calm and insists on arguing the point, not the man.

So - as I said, you're completely misstating what I said - and you know it. I have not called you or anyone else on this forum names and you are proving my point here. If you take offense to me calling a racist a racist or a sexual predator bad then that's your problem not mine.