>I'm, disappointed that you ignored the part about Moore. Never mind.
>
>>>The last thing I'm going to discuss with you is the ridiculousness of religion and the hypocrisy of Christians and Catholics
>
>Not asking you to comment on the religions themselves. It's a straight question: should Catholics be barred from office unless they renounce their faith's teachings?
>
>Or can electorates decide whether they trust a candidate to distinguish between his/her personal beliefs and their desires, assuming they differ?
>
>Finally, if you can believe that Jones thinks women should have complete control over their bodies but will respect the limitations in existing abortion legislation- then why can't Moore (or Catholics) be trusted to do the same?

A candidate should adhere to the separation of church and state. If his/her personal beliefs differ, then they need to accept that church looses and the state wins. We are not a theocracy. Moore is a religious lunatic though (which is another problem all together) - and don't ask me to find you example of that either.