>>I'm not disputing that the AHA isn''t perfect. What I've been saying is that it's better than what he had, and the GOP wants to kill it at the expense of the American people so the rich can have a tax break and take healthcare away from 10's of millions of Americans in the process. They have nothing better to replace it with - it's just that Obama has his name on it, so it's gotta go - and screw everyone in the process if they have too.
I agree that dismantling individual mandate comes across as a spiteful repudiation, but will it change the outcome now that the taxpayer spigot is turned off? Seems to me the GOP is kicking a dead horse. And if and when they propose their alternative: unless they suddenly discover why individual mandate matters after all, then here we go again.
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1