>>>As I said before, I have access to data and formation that you do not, which legally I can't share with you - so all I can say is that you do not have enough info or data nor the ability to get it - so there is not point in continuing the discussion.
>
>LOL. And there are people out there with secret information proving that Obama was born in Africa, but legally they can't reveal it etc etc.
>
>My view: unless you're talking about patient data that actually involves a Business Associate Agreement (BAA) in the US rather than an NDA: with an entire industry and as many as 38 federal agencies dedicated to collecting and aggregating the data relied upon by the likes of S&P, you can't expect people to be impressed by claims of secret information that doesn't just represent commercial advantage (which is why it's secret) but trumps all cited analysis and aggregated data everybody else relies on.
>
>Instead of seeming to domineer, why not just engage the Kaiser or S&P analysis and show why you think it's wrong?

There is HIPAA and there is my NDA. I take any NDA I sign seriously so that is that. The Kaiser S&P analysis shows that the markets under the current laws were stable, which contradicts what the Republicans have said.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/07/health/insurers-stem-losses-and-may-soon-profit-from-obamacare-plans.html