>>>>>
>>>>>Had the majority in 2016 by 3 million people. Expect the GOP to pay the price for this in 2018.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>HRC only won 20 states....that's the number that counts.
>>>
>>>Yep. The Electoral College failed to do it's job, which was supposed to be to prevent someone like Trump taking office.
>>
>>The job of the electoral college isn't to prevent against candidates whom you find disgusting.
>>
>>If you want to talk about who didn't do "their job", look no further than the DNC and the HRC, which had so many advantages and failed.
>>
>>If anyone thinks the electoral college should have prevented Trump, I hate to say this, but that person might have made some deeper philosophical errors.
>
>The Electoral College did NOT do their job Kevin -- the framers were particularly afraid of the people choosing a demagogue. The electors, Hamilton believed, would prevent someone with “talents for low intrigue, and the little arts of popularity” from becoming president. And they would combat “the desire in foreign powers to gain an improper ascendant in our councils.” They would prevent America’s adversaries from meddling in its elections. The founders created the Electoral College, in other words, in part to prevent the election of someone like Donald Trump.


There's a compelling argument that you just described both major candidates (HRC and Trump). :)

I have no proof that HRC and the Clinton foundation's ties with foreign governments constitute a felony - but their involvement with foreign powers is at least as unethical as anything Trump has done.