>
>The elimination of the state and local tax deductions, however, appear to be aggravating already difficult situations for the states involved.
>
>So, here's the plan-
>when the dems take over, leave the corporate tax rates where they are, soak the billionaires for enough to reinstate the state and local tax deductions.
If I understand the point at hand correctly (always doubtful in tax matters), eliminating those deductions as a result should show a person pays same amount of federal taxes with a different amount of local taxes added on.
If not done that way, those with minimal local taxes have to pay a higher part of federal taxes, subsidizing the federal part of high-tax states.
What is the reason for subsidizing states not able to get by with low taxes ?
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only