>> I'm not getting into stupid hypothetical arguments with you just so you can be a jackass who defends hatred an racism then claims you're not based on irrelevant obscure linguistics just to start sh_it for no reason other than to be a jerk.

The only hatred I see here comes from your regular belligerent rants if somebody dares to challenge your proclamations or ask a question that doesn't fit your rhetoric.

You issued a condescending suggestion to look up "racism" in the dictionary: my response is that if you look up the word "race" on which your word relies, you'll find either no context definition or so many definitions that "racist" could be applied whenever people with different skin tone or ethnicity interact.

In which case the term becomes a meaningless taunt like "jackass" (sic) or "jerk" (sic), a status it rapidly approaches when it's flung around so often to stifle debate.

If you don't like my Muslim example, how about this one: Do you prefer Chinese food or Wendy's? Careful not to be racist, now.

Refusing to spend even a minute looking up "race" so you can engage my point, because you prefer to spend more than a minute on a thinly disguised profane rant, means you're stuck in the mud, dude.