>>>Actually, it isn't.
>
>Actually it is. Jargon to delineate the magnitude of a crime/severity of punishment doesn't change the fact that they are crimes. Just as pot used to be a crime in some states until they changed the law. That's what should happen. People don't get to declare some crimes to be virtuous: if they're virtuous then you change the law before contempt for the law becomes fashionable.

So, OK.

A litterer ranks with Ted Bundy.
Makes perfect sense.
Got it.