>>I see the problems with the polls in the last election. One thing to remember is that they're just what they say they are -- polls. A lot of people who were going to vote for Trump probably were unwilling to admit it because they knew he was a racist dirtbag and didn't want to own up to the fact they were voting for such a person - thus skewing the poll numbers. Polls will never be 100% correct for many reasons - they only sample a small part of the population. And of course there was a consensus that the American voters would not be dumb enough to vote for Trump - obviously they were wrong about that.
Nice, but still not making sense. If people knew he was a racist dirtbag you'd be ashamed to vote for- why did they vote for him again? Yeah, I know the circular argument- because people who vote differently from you are stupid.
If he was such an unlikely candidate, why did HRC and DNC collude with those Russians via flimsy cutouts to create a hit dossier on Trump that was then used by politicized DOJ/FBI to spy on his team?
Why did a CNN stooge undermine democracy by leaking presidential debate questions to the HRC camp?
This dossier that's about to be released after Trump allows his 5-day right of reply to expire without comment- if it shows more dirt, why was your side motivated to behave like that, even faking evidence that it was Trump doing all these things you were doing yourselves?
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1