Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
State of the Union address predictions
Message
Information générale
Forum:
Politics
Catégorie:
Nouvelles
Divers
Thread ID:
01657613
Message ID:
01657747
Vues:
25
>>>>>What would you have me do? What are you doing?
>>>
>>>Good question.
>>>We can begin by refusing to let things like FBI memos, tweets about whatever, illegal lawn-mowers, porn star signatures and like distractions cloud the issue.
>>
>>I don't think that simply ignoring what the president says and does is a practical, viable, or wise solution.
>>
>>>In my case, I try to support candidates with anti-war and anti-military stances.
>>
>>Then a vote for Trump should of made no sense to you. Donald Trump campaigned on military spending increases beefing up the military. and larger forces.
>>
>Before the election, Donald Trump never had a chance to oppose the wars in Afghanistan or Iraq.

Incorrect. He publicly supported invading Iraq before we did. ...and besides that.. this belief you have that zero political experience is a good thing for a president of the USA is a foolish pattern of thought. (as is being proven every day since he took office lol lol)

>Hillary Clinton did and voted to support those insane and murderous wars.
>Hundreds of thousands of people have died and more continue to die each minute because of the policies she endorsed.
>You don't need to tell me how whacky he is, Victor.

But you need to CARE how wacky he is Bill.

>However, look at her body count vs his.

Look at his body count after 1 year of public service vs a life time of hers?. You understand that's a stupid unrealistic comparison right? What you did was roll the dice and hoped that a guy who campaigned on military spending increases, beefing up the military. more nukes, and larger forces would...ya know....not use the military? And also campaigned on hate, isolationism, "America first", etc etc etc ...and somehow came to the conclusion that it was wise to put the thin skinned narcissist is a bad temperament with no political experience (or skills) with zero diplomacy ability who's incapable of empathy in office because he would somehow keep us out of wars and work well with other countries? I swear I simply will never understand your logic because there is none. Clinton had moved towards Bernie on many issues - she was headed the direction you want...you had a chance with her - you had/have no chance with Trump - hell he isn't even going to make it his full term and is creating a constitutional crisis in the meantime!

>>>Bernie is a shining example.
>>
>>Yep.
ICQ 10556 (ya), 254117
Précédent
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform