>>When Trump hears a story he does not like, he just does not ust attack the journalist, he attacks the whole newspaper -- and when that is not enough he attacks the whole media. Then when the FBI starts poking around and finding out bad things he doesn't like, he attacks the FBI agents and the head of the FBI. When that doesn't work he attacks the whole FBI and all law enforcement. Same cycle with the DOJ. None of this is going to work in the long run.

Not sure why you're blaming Trump for what the Intelligence Committee did, but you ignored my point about a special counsel. Here it is again:

JR>Rather than "he said she said", I think a special counsel should be appointed to investigate with the same alacrity as the one appointed after Comey leaked classified information. I suggest you look past Fake News and consider the effects on the US if political appointees at DOJ/FBI really idid conspire to skew an election. Mud always sticks, so a special counsel is a great idea to end all the speculation and accusation, surely?

Special counsel have extraordinary powers to investigate and indict so if it's all a big Trump lie as you insist, a special counsel can bring Humpty crashing down even more spectacularly than when Mueller reveals all the Russian collusion. Why wouldn't you be salivating for that?