>>The meeting did not have to have value -- Trump Jr just had to think it did -- and seeing how he was told it did and said he thought it did,and thus took the meeting-- he broke the law.

No, I don't think that's right. The thing of value was the dirt, not its gift wrapping/meeting.

>>You do not know what the stacks and stacks of information that 4 different judges went though to approve the warrants. And as a side note here -- warrants in this country do not require the same level of proof as a conviction in a trail -- just 'probable cause' -- and you do not have any idea as to what all the factors where that allowed those 4 different judges 4 different times to determine there was probable cause for the warrants. This is what everyone has made it clear that the memo is misleading -- and again I suggest you read the last line of it lol lol.

You sound so learned, but you don't know what was in the warrants either and nor presumably does Vox or wherever you're getting your partisan talking points this time.

The risk is that Schiff leaks his oversized memo and as I keep saying, it devolves into partisan "he said she said" that seems designed to distract from the importance for US democracy, even if this is the whole iceberg rather than just the tip. Distraction is the antic of the guilty. Just saying.

I'm arguing for a special counsel who *will* see what's in the FISA warrants without any leaking of classified information. Maybe respond to that? Curious that you've now ignored this 3 times...