>> If someone has a problem with the FISA warrants being approved - then now does this not involve the judges who issued the warrants?

Not the approval- the use of the pee pee dossier to persuade the judge that there's cause. Collaborated by a Yahoo article leaked by Steele himself. I've seen nobody except you suggesting the judge is part of the conspiracy. If the judge were part of the conspiracy, the elaborate deception would not have been needed, surely.

>>The memo is a pile of b.s. -- you know that right?

You say that, but Gowdy says otherwise. I say a special counsel is needed to clear the air, one way or another.

>>The warrants are usually 50 or 60 pages each and this memo is just 4 pages...so needless to say out of 200 to 240 pages a tiny few things were picked to put in the memo

I've seen that talking point in the MSM, but the MSM doesn't have access to any FISA warrants, let alone these ones. Again, with all these swirling accusations that can't be validated by the citizenry without assistance, appoint a special prosecutor to clear the confusion.

>>And again I point to the fact that the first FISA warrant was issued prior to the dossier and that this is all the more shown to be totally dishonest by the holding back of the minority rebuttal memo.

So you know what's in the rebuttal? Then I say leak it immediately so a special counsel can be appointed rather than endless partisan speculation.

>> Furthermore none of this disputes any of the findings of what was discovered as a result of the warrants anyway does it?

Spying on Page? I'm not sure what was found. If there were other FISA warrants then so far that's been successfully concealed from the Committee, which is another argument for the powers of a special counsel to empanel grand juries and compel witnesses.