>>The statue is clearly directed at direct or indirect payments or reimbursements that be assigned a monetary value.

It's in line with international anti-corruption mechanisms. We amateurs can argue over whether information about HRC's illegal dealings with Russians is a thing of value to Trump -which it obviously is in lay terms but possibly not in legal terms.

There's also the question of the meeting. Why did they meet- why wasn't the information simply transmitted? Could Trump JR have been trying to collude with somebody he thought was an agent of the Kremlin?

We can't know, because it's not in writing and it turned out she had no information, didn't know she was supposed to have such information, had tenuous connections to the Kremlin- and wanted to talk about adoption.

No need for such niceties wrt the pee pee dossier: if funded by HRC and the DNC then they broke the law, period.