Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
State of the Union address predictions
Message
From
06/02/2018 16:21:42
John Ryan
Captain-Cooker Appreciation Society
Taumata Whakatangi ..., New Zealand
 
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
News
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01657613
Message ID:
01657938
Views:
33
>>Except that since it's ONLY 4 pages it's obviously left out a huge amount of information, and what's in there was not only cherry picked, but also what went to the president to release was also not even what was voted on because "material changes" were made to it before he got it. And what about that the dossier came AFTER the first FISA warrant? It could not of been used because it did ot exist yet lol.

You're just throwing any piece of mud you can find, relevant or not, in the hope that something sticks.

You can't "cherry pick" whether the FBI/DOJ knowingly used HRC's Russian hoax pee pee document to trick a FISA court judge. They either did or didn't. Arguing over whether they *needed* to use it, is like a thief who stole $100 arguing that he could have paid all his bills without the theft, so it shouldn't matter.... while others argue that it was actually Trump who stole the $100.

/edit/

That didn't take long. Yesterday the chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee said

I believe that the entire FISA application, including the affidavit attached, taking out methods and sources, should be released to the American people, so we have a full context of what was the basis for the application from an evidence standpoint. I believe Americans, be it Democrat or Republican have a right to see that.

He also said in relation to the Strzok bias scandal:

I do believe the Inspector General is looking into a couple of these FBI agent’s political motivations in relation to some of these politically charged investigations. When I was at the Justice Department in the public integrity section, we prided ourselves on not being partisan. Nobody knew what your political affiliation was and that was for a reason. We were not supposed to bring our politics into that office because it undermines the integrity of the institution and the credibility. And that should not have happened in this case. The IG is looking at this particular investigation, but I would respectfully request and recommend that the IG also expand his investigation into this FISA warrant application to determine whether it was valid or not.

The trouble for Rosenstein is the conflict of being investigator and witness- since he signed one of the applications. Special counsel!
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us.
"
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform