>https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasdelbeccaro/2018/02/05/biased-fbi-and-doj-officials-broke-the-law-and-tried-to-decide-the-election-an-annotated-timeline/#33387e407f34
>
>In fairness, the author was Chairman of the CA GOP and was a GOP candidate for Senate. But it's an early whisper that the fake news emperor has no clothes.
>
>Meanwhile Adam Schiff is starting to receive some of what he dishes out to others. It was called "treason" that Trump JR met a foreigner he believed had dirt on HRC, so what's this:
>
>http://video.dailymail.co.uk/video/mol/2018/02/06/2096362360821336851/640x360_MP4_2096362360821336851.mp4
>
>It's worth going back to review Schiff's introduction to Comey's testimony to the House Committee. He laid out one of those lists of accusations and asked ominously "is it possible that all of these events and reports are completely unrelated and nothing more than an entirely unhappy coincidence?" - words that can be expected to come back to haunt him now.
>
>Meanwhile if I were on Trump's campaign, now I'd start insisting that Schiff's Russian pranksters are the same "unnamed sources" that invariably feature in WAPO's and NYT's hit jobs. Hoist them on their own petard!


OK, you can ignore my last email....apparently the article was deleted on the Forbes site. However, I found a site that managed to save the content.

I just read it...and I can't believe I'm saying this - it's a cheap piece.

I consider myself pretty good at distinguishing between serious conservative journalism and the stuff you see on the website of Rush Limbaugh or hear on Fox News. This article falls more under the second. So I kind of agree with Bill F