>>>You have ignored part of what I said (again) taken part of it out of context (again) and deleted part of what I said (again) in your reply. This is what you do when you've been proven wrong - because if you include everything we've said it's obvious this is the case. Lame.
>
>Your full post:
>
>>>hh huhh... so he 'advocated ' for something when he wasn't in politics and and no control over it. Meanwhile, when he CAN do something - all he's done is sign a bill blocking Obama-era background checks on guns for people with mental illnesses. He prevented a new data source from included the system that runs background checks. Another worthless politician who's been paid off by the NRA to the tune of over 30 MILLION dollars -- don't fool yourself into thinking he's some savior of the anti-gun violence folks lol lol.
>
>First and last sentences are just mean flails with no merit.
>
>2nd sentence:
>>>Meanwhile, when he CAN do something - all he's done is sign a bill blocking Obama-era background checks on guns for people with mental illnesses
>That's the sentence I replied to.
>
>3rd sentence:
>>>He prevented a new data source from included the system that runs background checks.
>I answered this too- since that "new data source" seems to be discrimination per Amendment 4 unless there's due cause or evidence of danger from the affected group. Is it true that people on disability who need assistance, are such a risk that they deserve to be singled out? I doubt it. There's plenty of mental impairments that cause decent citizens to need assistance without making them a danger to others, Victor.
>
>You say I'm proven wrong: so go for it, leave out the hating and just provide the evidence that this group is such a risk that they deserve to be singled out specially.

So up until yesterday with his thing to Sessions about the bump stocks - the only legislative thing that Trump has done regrading guns since he took office was to make it easier for mental patients to get guns -then correct?...and in doing so he prevented a new data source from included the system that runs background checks. - correct? You seem to have a problem accepting that fact dude.
1. Trump blocked a rule making it harder for the mentally ill to buy guns.
2. Trump made it easier for fugitives to by guns.
3. GOP moved to loosen gun restrictions on federal grounds.
4. Republicans announced a bill to make it easier to buy silencers.
5. At one point congress talked about banning bump stockss - but didn't do a damn thing.
6. Paul Ryan ignored calls from a select committee on gun violence.
7. Hose passed a bill allowing Concealed carry across state lines.
8. Trump has proposed cutting millions of dollars from from the back ground check system

...so this is what the Trump administration has done since he took office -- and you seem to think that oooh he 'advocated 'for something in 2000 ( more stuff that you left out - but the hell with it - you're going to leave stuff out cause that's what you do) so you were clearly saying that Trump has some record of being against guns - and I have thus called you out on that B.S. . But THIS time you left out everything you said -- so again you've taken what I said out of context because there is no reference to what I was talking about since you deleted it. Move along John...Trump is not your anti-gun-violence savior - he is your bought off politician from the NRA to the tune of 30 MILLION dollars. Any suggestion otherwise is unfounded by the pattern of behavior and the facts.