>>>>What is his position on men's reproductive rights?
>>
>>Depends what they identify as.
>
>I said "men's reproductive rights."
>What is ambiguous about that?
Possible operational definitions of men:
Chomosome "typical" XY
Chromosome n>0 Y
Chromosome X<2
Phenotype having external plumbing (XX genotypes developing external plumbing without surgery due to some special locations on them)
current plumbing state (external vs. internal, no consideration if helped by surgery/medicamentation)
"gender feeling"
As #4 is usually coupled with some other phenotype characteristics usually found more often on XY (facial hair, muscle/fat ratio), a Aristotelian true/false scale is already negated by pure biology going around "typical"/pure XY/XX options available.
As #4 does not produce sperm, the rights issue is somewhat moot, but defining men as those producing viable sperm might upset a considerable XY percentage where sperm production is not abundant/highly movable ;-)
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only