>>>
>>>>b. What should Mike Pence provide for some who is NOT transsexual or gay?
>>>
>>>Equal rights.
>>
>>So, let's see.
>>Woody Johnson, who inherited plus or minus $10 billion, and is NOT transsexual or gay-
>>
>>a- needs Mike Pense to grant him equal rights
>>b- human decency requires me to worry about poor Woody's rights?
>>
>>I'm learning things every day.
>
>I'm confused as to why on earth you would bring up the Ambassador to the United Kingdom, a rich stoner, when talking about equal rights for transsexuals and gays. Is it because he had a daughter that was a lesbian? (you know the daughter he abandoned when she came out as gay) What on earth does this have to do with Mike Pence's offensive stance against homosexuals? Is it that these two see eye to eye on treating them poorly or something? Or is this supposed to be an example of not human decency? Please connect the dots here for me I seem to not grasp what you're getting at. And yes - human decency does require you to worry about his civil rights despite the fact he himself does not for some people.
>
>>>>c. Why should I care about a. or b.?
>>>
>>>Human decency.

Read what I asked


>> What should Mike Pence provide for some who is NOT transsexual or gay?
>>>
>>>Equal rights.
>>
>>So, let's see.
Woody Johnson, who inherited plus or minus $10 billion, and is NOT transsexual or gay-



Woody is neither transsexual or gay (at least as far as I know)

What equal rights should Mike provide for Woody?