>>>For me the interesting part was Hannity neglecting to mention his own involvement when interviewing the man in charge of the policy.
>
>It's interesting that this has only become interesting now. There's plenty of journalists with vested interest they don't see fit to disclose. Probably it's for the good of society if they all start being outed now.

Yes -- however in Hannity's case things are a bit different. He not only reaches 3 million viewers but also Trump will do whatever Hannity says. None of these recent revelations should come as a shock to anyone -- Hannity spends a great deal of time spreading false conspiracy theories and is a racist bigot. His 3 million or so 'viewers' are for the most part Trump's base of hate-mongers and folks who seem to think that ideology is more important than facts - and that seems to fit right in line with the Fox "News" model - so Fox "News" is not going to care about any of this as all they're interested in is profits - not actual news and facts. As Ted Koppel told Hannity to his face -- he's bad for America. Sean Hannity going on and on about Michael Cohen (...that is defending Micheal Cohen) and not ever revealing his relationship with him is just one of the zillions of examples of very poor journalism from Hannity.