>>>>>>I don't know for sure but I think they say that testing a driver for DUI of pot is not easy or maybe not yet developed. That is, again, if I understand correctly, all current DUI testing methods are not detecting pot. Although you can smell it easy.
>>>>>>I am not a pot smoker so I would not know.
>>>>>
>>>>>Actually pot in blood or urine is too easy to detect... weeks after the fact. I know of a person who got a job in a different state, relocation costs paid etc, but couldn't get employed because she was positive on pot test (and pot is legal in her home state). She didn't touch it for three weeks, and still tested positive.
>>>>
>>>>What I meant is testing a driver with a breathalyzer, which is what cops use. I am sure that in hospitals or using blood tests, they can detect anything.
>>>
>>>Like we said a dozen times already, future sucks.
>>>
>>>I want a friggin tricorder, not only to be used as a breathalyzer, I want it in my hand when I go for groceries.
>>
>>I am sure if you write to your Serbia local representative, they will listen to you :)
>
>I got nothing to say to those guys, only to prosecution, in case they forget something.

This is what Representative Democracy is all about: they represent you and you tell them what to do :)