Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
The Truth behind Computers
Message
From
24/06/2018 18:31:38
 
 
To
24/06/2018 15:58:58
John Ryan
Captain-Cooker Appreciation Society
Taumata Whakatangi ..., New Zealand
General information
Forum:
Humor
Category:
Comics
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01660690
Message ID:
01660848
Views:
46
>It's not about terrible things according to your judgment. It's about another person's expectations of privacy. In the absence of criminality or warrant, She should have the chance to decide whether you get to browse her medical history.
>
What is so special about her medical history?
Car buyers now can, and should have the ability to, learn whether or not the clunker I'm trying to pawn off has been in accident.
Insurers now can , and should have the ability to, check my driving record to see if I'm a menace on the road.
Police now can, and should have the ability to, check for outstanding warrants on a routine traffic stop.

Shouldn't a would-be-suitor have an ethical right to know that the target of his affections is pregnant- or having an abortion?

What gives pregnant women special privacy status?



>Until then, it's none of your business.
It is my business if I have an interest in her pregnant/non-pregnant status.
If it really is none of my business, what harm can happen if I learn that someone I don't know is or isn't pregnant?

On the other hand, let's suppose the lady is found passed out in her car by a passing cop. If that cop could know that she was pregnant, it might save her life.
Anyone who does not go overboard- deserves to.
Malcolm Forbes, Sr.
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform