>>That's a euphemism for women don't want babies.

I'm quoting your own citation there... that you used as a reason why immigration is needed.

I doubt that your Catholic Fitzgerald example was a high powered lawyer torn between career and having a tribe of kids. Increasingly that's the reality these days.

Meanwhile the unmarried Prime Minister of New Zealand just had a baby and is taking off only 6 weeks maternity leave rather than the 6 months she says should be allowed. Apparently the baby dad is going to be a stay home mom. That's great, but apart from politics neither male nor female can step aside from many careers these days for 6 months without consequence. And there's no saying how all this will end up yet.

>>"Reproductive rights" is another euphemism for women deciding to prevent conception or murder the fetus.

But who is having the abortions? It's not Muslims, for example. The reality is that diverse modern society incentivizes bearing babies by poor people- except blacks who are so encouraged to have abortions that there are more black abortions in NY than there are babies delivered- while affluent families are told that wife working = virtue and you must rely on 2 incomes to keep up with the Jonses.

IOW "we" did it to ourselves. Ask your own kids: how come none of them had 11 kids per the Fitzgerald examples you quoted?

>>Look at what's happened to our culture since the sixties.
>>Divorce rates - out of sight.
>>Out of wedlock births - out of sight.
>>Addiction - rampant.
>>Suicide rates- setting new records.
>>Better educated.
>>OK.

Fix the ptoblem, not the blame: what to do? Toss out old citizens and replace with new?