>>Possibly, but that was not the point. I quoted extreme right-wing media to show you that not even them would make the claim that you did.

The claim I made was that 70 skeletons voted in the recent elections. When I checked online, all I could find was allegations that 72 skeletons voted in the 2016 elections. My bad. I agree it's too early to say how many voted this time, but that's not the same as "none" as seems to be your interpretation.

>>If you read closely the analysis of the Supreme Court decision process you'd see that the problem was not the purging of voter lists in itself, but the purging method, which was considered too aggressive and likely to result in a lot of false positives.

Nice use of the "read a book" taunt, except that in real life the Supreme Court says that what you call "purging" is not too aggressive and the state can go ahead. Seems strange that you'd make it sound as if the SC actually supports your view, in the same post in which you scold me for a timing issue you say makes me more extreme even than the extreme right.

>>FYI: Before the Nov 2016 election, the 3 largest counties in Ohio already had removed at least 144,000 voters from their lists.

That's like saying that you may smoke a pack a day but it used to be 3 packs a day so you shouldn't be called a smoker any more.

>>As for the recent special election, I wonder what stopped the "170 people over 116 years old" (that, allegedly, are still on the voting lists) from voting, especially since it was a much closer race than the 2016 election?

I'm amazed that you've already conducted your investigation to determine that none of the 72 from 2016 voted this time. Of course you haven't: instead you subtly misrepresent the SC's decision and act as if you have proof that no skeletons voted, while you scold and label over a timing issue that doesn't change the point at all.

A wise man once said that planning consists of hoping for the best but preparing for the worst. The worst is that elections are determined by anti-American skeleton/illegal vote farmers who swing elections. You may wish to plan as if no skeleton or Russian colluder would ever behave that way, but every other democracy I know of and now the state of Ohio and SC disagrees with your narratives. But don't worry, there's plenty more states to force all the way to the SC and in the meantime maybe an election can be subverted to help impeach Trump, yay!