>>Hey I'm no fan of Mitt either - but don't try to pull the 'fake news' bit here - that is getting old - especially when you back it up with a 30 second campaign ad lol.
OK. What's the gist of corporate tax cuts? Virtuous, leading to economic growth? Or a gift to the 1% at the expense of the working and middle classes?
(Careful- might pay to remember who else might have advocated corporate tax cuts)
>>starting with the fact that the American voter, as a whole, is stupid in regards to politics.
Either that, or they brilliantly predicted that Trump would do more than give rousing speeches about unbalanced trade practices costing the US jobs or the North Korean situation.
>>A vote for Mitt would not be one I would agree with because I don't like too many of his policies - but I could at least respect that vote. A vote for Trump is just f-ing stupid - as proven by the results of his presidency thus far.
By results, you mean the huge noise made by CNN and the rest of the far left? Maybe check out CNN's ratings to confirm that people aren't as stupid as elites might like. As for Mitt: he was one of the earliest proponents of a unified healthcare funding scheme, in Massachusetts. Would you have agreed with that?
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1