>>I think I agree with you here on this for the most part - however this is something that has not been tested in the courts. Justice dept opinions are trumped by supreme court rulings. There is also the thinking that no one, even the president, is above the law.
Which is why activists on the SC are no good. If the legal position is a), that should not be subverted by activist judges motivated to push b).
>>So - this hasn't been tested by the courts - Trump is in hot water via Muller - and we know Kavanaugh's views. Kavanaugh gets added to the list after Muller. It's not rocket science lol.
Added to the list after Mueller- did what? Ran a bath for Trump? That's the only hot water for Trump I can see so far.
>>And really if you think about it if your sitting president can be indited for crimes you've got a constitutional crisis happening already.
You don't get to indict anybody by wishing evil on them. You need an allegation of crime supported by evidence.
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1
