>>>> I'm simply stating that you seem to not understand the significance nor impact of the supreme court for Americans...
>>
>>It's going bad, Victor. You're right: there has been partisan voting over issues like voter suppression which ought to dismay the citizenry, but gets buried beneath absurdities. The only solution is to return to the original masterpiece of planning with a SC comprising legalists of who cares what color.
>>
>>>> nor the whole scope of the Kavanaugh nomination or why he was nominated in the first place.
>>
>>By these mysterious and ominous references I assume you're objecting to his nomination by Trump?
>
>Well - it's not so much that object to it really -- Trump has the right to nominate whoever he wants...but it's obvious why he was magically added to the list after Muller lol... What bothers me is that the GOP is willing to rubber-stamp whoever he picks no matter what and the committee hearings have been a farce from the start. It looks more banana republic than the USA. Note that GOP members have been saying they'll vote for him regardless of what the witnesses say, so they are not willing to gather information or evidence prior to making a decision. THAT I object to. They can stall for a year to rob Obama - but need to push this guy though before they have the facts?

As the saying goes, "elections have consequences". Obama won - he gets to nominate. The GOP won the majority - they can refuse to approve. Nobody "robbed" anybody.