>I do not agree with Microsoft's EULA philosophy at all. But it is law.

Huh? Last time I checked EULA was just an EULA. Contracts are not law, law might hold you to it or might give damages to other party.
If contract go against established law or are too unprincipled, they (or csuch clauses) are void.

...

>I would also argue that for conscience' sake, everyone who clicks "I Accept" is self-bound by your own word and honor to obey what you agreed to.

When clauses are against law, I can decide if I want to follow them or not. Springing EULAs after payment or including parts clearly going against current laws will at least lower any obligation I feel.