>>I wonder where you got your quotes, if not form the media. Clearly, everyone can see Sanders' frustration with Acosta, but just for conformity, here is the official statement, and the actual "behavior that cannot be tolerated"
>>https://twitter.com/PressSec/status/1060333176252448768?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fpolitics%2Fcnns-jim-acosta-press-pass-suspended-by-white-house-sarah-sanders-announces

I see a statement extending across five tweets with the part you quote in tweet 1 and the declaration of suspension at tweet 5. That first tweet has a ... to indicate it flows into the second, which is the one I quoted. Tweets 3 and 4 also sport ... and provide other context, all of which is systematically ignored by those who insist that part of the 1st and the 5th tweets are the whole statement. Why isn't that Fake News?

If you scroll down, somebody has also posted the C-Span original footage against the "doctored" Infowars gif version. What can you see?

What I see, is a reporter who already had 2 questions (bearing in mind that Obama sometimes allowed only one) refusing to cede the mike as an official tried 3 times to secure it- check the full video to see her being resisted 3 times. Touch or no touch, he deserves the naughty chair. So why did Sanders catastrophize the touch? I know that's your question, but now I'm asking it back. ;-)