>>>On the legal side, EULA is a contract submitted by each party's national, and international law. A lawyer would probably argue that, whenever the editor no longer services the product, users de facto have the right to tamper it.
>>>
>>>On the practical side, no one at microsoft has ever cared, and cares about VFP being decompiled; it's no longer strategic, if it ever was.
>>
>>I've contacted Microsoft's legal department to get their official position on VFPA's legality for use in VFP9 Professional by U.S. entities (citizens, corporations).
>
>What a miserable thing to do! You had no obligation to do this, and you've chosen to try to create trouble.
>
>Tamar

Tamar, the consensus here is that Rick's position isn't a strong one

Having said that, your reply here is interesting, given you've often advocating for reaching out to leaders, governing bodies ("write your local representative, etc.")

I don't agree with Rick's position - but probably more curious that you of all people would object and call it "miserable".

Am I correct in saying you only advocate activism when you agree with the position? Does obligation lose a moral context if it's not yours?