Information générale
Catégorie:
Gestionnaire d'écran & Écrans
Versions des environnements
>>>>On the legal side, EULA is a contract submitted by each party's national, and international law. A lawyer would probably argue that, whenever the editor no longer services the product, users de facto have the right to tamper it.
>>>>
>>>>On the practical side, no one at microsoft has ever cared, and cares about VFP being decompiled; it's no longer strategic, if it ever was.
>>>
>>>I've contacted Microsoft's legal department to get their official position on VFPA's legality for use in VFP9 Professional by U.S. entities (citizens, corporations).
>>
>>What a miserable thing to do! You had no obligation to do this, and you've chosen to try to create trouble.
>>
>>Tamar
>
>Tamar, the consensus here is that Rick's position isn't a strong one
>
>Having said that, your reply here is interesting, given you've often advocating for reaching out to leaders, governing bodies ("write your local representative, etc.")
>
>I don't agree with Rick's position - but probably more curious that you of all people would object and call it "miserable".
>
>Am I correct in saying you only advocate activism when you agree with the position? Does obligation lose a moral context if it's not yours?
No, this isn't about activism. He's not advocating for leaders to change the law or the rules. He's tattling.
Tamar
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement