>>>Why does Rick feel the urge to stir this up?
>>
>>You posted this before I had completed my other post, so I'll make an exception here to replying to you:
>>
>>The ONLY reason I mentioned this at all is because it passed before my eyes and I viewed what Chen was doing as a violation of the EULA. I've since revised that thinking that perhaps in China he's not violating the EULA because the laws there may allow his work. This is not a certainty, but it's a possibility, and I accept that. The same is true for people in other countries. It's possible, but not a guarantee everywhere.
>>
>>But to my true and honest knowledge, it would be illegal for U.S. citizens or corporations to receive his work and use it in their VFP9 versions. And that's what my inquiry to Microsoft was about (U.S. interests using Chen's work).
>
>
>Then you must be able to show be the law that says this. If you are not able to do that, You should not have brought this up.
>
>Awaiting your proof.

No proof, because then he will say he does not care what the law says. He will jump on the moral train. But then again, he says it is illegal. But abortion is legal, so it does not matter. It is immoral to follow the law, so we should not obey the law. We should follow his moral.

Maybe a troll?