>>Relativate your statements. You insist on the word illegal. You repeat it, knowing that you create anger with it. What is that good for? Should we think that your moral/belive is to give us a hard day? I don't think that. I know the base of your belive is centered about a very, very modest, forgiving beeing.
>
>Ownership rights and laws relating to ownership rights exist. They should be respected and obeyed.
>
>It is that simple.

So does consumer rights which conflict those. You see things black and white, but in reality they are not.
You are the zealot that takes only one side, not do the research and deliberately start inflicting damage.


I've seen you make the statement about visual freepro, and its very easy to see that your motivation is disgusting.