>> I agree that this is a good idea and if presented in the right way $M would probably receive it well. I would hope that we, as a group (fox developers), would not limit what we are asking for from $M to what we think they will give us. That seems defeatist to me.
>
>You're right, it is somewhat defeatist, but I'd hate to put a lot of effort into assembling a list of features that I know they won't provide.
Mike,
How much work can it be? Hit me with your top 3 on this thread, and I hit you with mine. Now we already have six in the list.
regards
Jim Edgar
Jurix Data Corporation
jmedgar@yahoo.comNo trees were destroyed in sending this message. However, a large number of electrons were diverted from their ordinary activities and terribly inconvenienced.
