>>>Muller is still working and now the house intelligence committee is actually going to do something as it's not ran by the GOP anymore. In case you missed the news they released their 5 point investigation specs today lol.
>
>In your shoes I'd be concerned at recent precedent. First, any potential male candidate now needs to be chaperoned and coached from teen years or else he will be accused of sexual or black face impropriety decades ago for a baying mob to destroy his career. It looks as if the entire Dem upper level in Virginia currently is learning the meaning of "he who lives by the sword, dies by the sword." They used to scoff at Pence for refusing to be alone in any circumstance with a woman who is not his wife- yet that is the only defense in 2019 and it's becoming established in business, creating a barrier for women whose usual mentors now perceive too much risk. Second, unless future POTUS has house and Senate of his/her own party, future POTUS can be expected to be mired in endless probes and investigation that would be an abuse of process if police did it to a citizen. These precedents may be satisfying to attack a hated enemy today, but it'll be different when you get to take your own medicine.
>
On need to have a pristine (or Teflon?) decades long history I follow your scepticism fully.

But that is not the target of Muller investigation - and there I think Trump opened the doors himself at least in part by not disclosing his Tax records during campaign as was usual practice, then promising to do so if/when elected, and after winning scrapping that campaign promise.