>>> They have electric planes already -- and solar can provide power plants. Do not think backwards -- think technology and advancements.
>
>I see your Senator now is expressing misgivings about how the glorious green revolution will affect Hawaii. Perhaps she's not as convinced that Flash Gordon will come down to save the day.
>
>>>You can start with the things he directed Michael Cohen to do.
>
>So you were there and heard it? That puts a new complexion on it. What, exactly, did you hear? If you're talking about payments to a blackmailing porn star, was she a Russian agent or how does it relate to Russian collusion?

Read the guilty plea...the part where he says the president instructed him to break the law (under oath).

>>>Of course it will - but that is not the only thing it could revel -- ties to Russia and where money comes from and goes is what will be an eye-opener.
>
>But apart from the fake dossier Hillary produced, do you have any evidence whatsoever to support your belief? If not, then it's quite Stalinist to declare what somebody "could" have done just because you don't like them and then investigate forever hoping to find something to support your accusation, and prosecuting people along the way for incidental things you find with nothing to do with Russian collusion by Trump. That's something you'd expect from the Cold War KGB, not modern Western democracy.

OMG. Hillary did not produce nor use the dossier - and in case you missed it much of it has been verified. The dossier has nothing to do with any of this. Quite saying collusion, it's conspiracy. We do not have results of the investigation(s) yet. Then examine what is obvious and makes sense.

>As one wag observed: if Trump walked on water, some would crow that it proves he can't swim and Schiff would say some Russians can't swim either, hmm what a coincidence, we'd better investigate his taxes.

Speculation of Trump's ability to defy the laws of gravity has nothing to do with if he violated the laws of the USA -- which he has.

>>>That being said -- we have not seen his taxes so we do not know if anything is there to find. But -- looking at the whole picture here -- it stands to reason there is.

>Actually he's already admitted to playing the "avoid the tax" rich man's game, observing that if Congress hadn't allowed it, he couldn't have done it. A better question would be why Congress always wants to create hidey holes for the rich to shirk their obligations. Maybe you should investigate that.

Simple:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRM1t4RU69c

..and that video also brings me back to our discussion on how a 'revolution' can happen -- you end up with a bunch of folks like this voted in and the laws get changed. The GOP will try to tell you that she is a fringe wacko communist for wanting to raise taxes and such -- but yet 76% of American's agree with her on this -- so that is not really 'fringe' is it ...? when 76% of the people are with you lol. And how many people do you think want big-biz out of politics? How many people do you think want congress members writing laws just to enrich themselves? She one without any corporate money and no superpaks -- it can be done again -- and will.

Thinking that he does not want to release his taxes because he followed the letter of the law and there is nothing fishy to see is unlikely though doesn't it?? Only thing I can think of is the possibility that he does not want to release them because i twill expose that he is nothing but a fraud and has no where near as much money as he claims. Nothing illegal about that I suppose -- but it would damage his brand quite badly and it would be quite embarrassing for him -- and seeing how he is such a narcissist he would do anything necessary to stop it. But considering the endless lies about ties to Russia financing and such it appears that is for sure going to be the bigger part of it....but odds are that both of these possibilities are true.

hRM1t4RU69c