>>>If you REALLY want to do that then you need to go though every single one of those items and explain why it does not apply -- otherwise he has done something impeachable. You are not going to be able to do that.
>
>I don't agree that accusations are automatically true unless somebody is prepared to waste untold time wading through the bulky sophistry pointing out the misrepresentations.
>
>Even if I did, there's plenty more where that came from and clearly you're convinced and never can be persuaded, in which case I'm surprised Mueller hasn't already lowered the boom to end the reign of terror before more damage is done.

There is absolutely no way you can refute every item on that list..but since you are unwilling to look at details, lets make it a bit simpler :)

Do you agree with any of these 4 statements?

Trump never divested from his business interests, he violates the Constitution every time the Trump Organization has business dealings with foreign or American government officials.
Yes?

Trump has repeatedly attempted to interfere in the Russia investigation, and admitted as much—that’s a clear case of obstructing justice.
Yes?

Trump tried to cover up his campaign’s contacts with a Russian national—which, at very least, constituted a violation of federal law.
Yes?

Trump’s pardon of Joe Arpaio violates the Fifth Amendment and harms the guarantee of Constitutional rights.
Yes?