>>>Comey was not a prosecutor - he was an investigator. If a prosecutor felt that there was enough to prosecute then they would of.
>
>If this is code for the AG should have made the declaration, not Comey- we agree. Can we also agree she no longer needed to after Comey said his piece.

It's not code for me saying the AG should of made the declaration (although I agree with that) -- I'm merely pointing out that the conclusion was there was nothing to prosecute. If the AG would of said it too then perhaps it would of made people like you happier?? Doubt it...so why bother?

>>>Keep in mind that Trump and his cohorts are so f-ing stupid that they do things right out in the open. Using the brilliant legal mind Rudy Giuliani who said ..how can it be a crime when it happened in the open?
>
>You can't expect me to trust the paraphrase.... but perhaps he meant how can it be a conspiracy if it was out in the open. I've also asked you that, btw.

Of course it can -- you just have to be stupid lol A crime is still a crime if there are witnesses to it.