>>Shrieks from whom?
>>Grand juries don't shriek.

Nor are they necessarily public.

>>If the facts are as clear as you make them, the indictment should be handed up in minutes.

It's not really my opinion here, I think it's accepted that use of a private email server for government business was illegal and you're not supposed to destroy subpoenaed evidence and on it goes. You ask me why no indictments? I ask you back what you'd expect if Flynn, Manafort or Cohen had done this.

The IG's report has since confirmed that Comey's handling of the email matter departed “clearly and dramatically from FBI and department norms" and hurt the FBI's reputation for impartiality and that he had been "extraordinary and insubordinate" and that the AG also showed an error of judgment. The report is riddled with "faulty judgment" findings as explanation for not pursuing a thorough investigation and also refers to difficulties after Obama publicly declared, twice, that HRC had done nothing wrong.

To add to the fun, I see that fired FBI deputy director McCabe's upcoming memoir doesn't just attack Trump, it also rips Lynch for refusing to recuse herself from the Clinton email investigation and accuses her and Yates of other misbehaviors.

So if some of your countryfolk sincerely believe in deep state leftist conspiracies and that the fix was in to protect Dirty Hillary, you can't blame them. Me? I will continue to draw attention to glaring disparities in the absence of credible explanation. You should too, fwiw.

>>We impound grand juries to look at stains on dresses and rant on cable "news" about high crimes and misdemeanors.
>>It's crazy but I guess it's better than attacking other countries.

Amen to that.