>One thing I can see in the first suit brought by the Covington victims of the whole hateful movement, refers to easily-demonstrated anti-Trump bias of WAPO. In their shoes I'd be as worried about that as about the $250M suit because it that's accepted by the court, the Fake News stain will never be erased.

JR, on the Covington story, I think the legal foundation for his suit is really shaky.

I agree, he was maligned by the newspaper and other media outlets and even the "non-correction correction" by the Post at the very end of last week kind of tells you something. But I don't see it holding up in court.

It's been known for years that baiting the left isn't rocket science. I'm sure many wearing MAGA hats know that. :)

You won't see me wearing a MAGA hat or even an Ayn Rand hat. Other than t-shirts of my favorite sports teams, you'll never guess anything from me by my attire (JB once said I dress kind of like a fisherman)

Borrowing from Edmond Rostand, I carry my adornments (and my love for individual rights) on my soul - decked with deeds instead of ribbons.

OK, I get the personal branding of Trump and there's nothing necessarily wrong with a MAGA hat (and I admit, I get a chuckle when it winds up baiting a liberal, nothing wrong with a little humor). But it's not exactly foundational, and that pretty much sums up my view of Trump. Non-foundational - so much so that he's not even consistent enough to earn the "racist" label.