>>Give me a couple days to back though all the posts and I'll P.M. you and we can discuss it that way without interference -- is that ok with you??
>
>Feel free to send whatever you want.
>
>I will tell you, and I hope JR sees this as well (for different reasons)…..we're going to talk about something else. I'm in an unusually punchy mood today, because of something I read.
>
>https://www.theblaze.com/news/college-dean-resigns-over-chick-fil-a-ban
>
>Why am I bringing this up? Because of this crap about "popular vote". Those who suddenly advocate "popular vote" are never after popular vote....it's about virtue-signaling and "getting their way"
>
>Rider University's College of Business did a formal survey about which outside restaurant and food service organizations would serve food on campus.
>
>Chick-fil-A won. I don't recall the exact numbers, but from what I remember reading, it won pretty comfortably. I don't eat fast food much these days, but I will say their food is much better than other fast food places.
>
>They won....they won a popular vote. And then the liberals on campus went berserk.
>
>Now...I'm not religious and I supported gay marriage long before Obama did. I also think Chick-fil-A runs a much better business than most fast food places. They also teach teenagers about manners and customer service.
>
>I am sick and tired of this cry-baby stuff from the left. Let's assume for a minute that the 2016 campaign HAD been run under the idea of popular vote. And let's say Trump still won. I'd bet a week's pay that there'd STILL be all this namby-pamby existentialist whining about dumb voters.
>
>In the words of Obama..."don't like the results? Go win an election". Except that in this case, Chick-fil-A "won" the election, and yet the liberals lost their minds and played the virtue card.
>
>Final note: it is well known that many African-American evangelicals are as opposed to gay marriage as the proverbial "old white male Republicans". If an African-American evangelical expressed the same views on gay marriage as Chick-fil-A did, I wonder how the students would have voted. Do not tell me for a second they would have voted the same.
>
>This is all about narrative. Normally, I detest it. Today I'm royally hacked off about it.

Rider is in my neighborhood, so tomorrow's papers should be featuring this story.

First - let's toss the word "liberal" out. It's really meaningless.
I think you're really ranting against political correctness, which is pervasive on most campuses.
The people who made this decision aren't fire-eyed, bomb-throwing Bolsheviks.
They're administrators with comfortable salaries and commodious perks that they want to protect.
It wouldn't shock me to learn that some of them covertly agree with the prof.
I think they did a quick calculation and concluded that in that very blue part (adjoining Princeton) of a very blue state, they're rather annoy people like this prof than large donors who might dislike Chick-fil-A.


Regarding the Dean - more power to her for walking the walk.
With her credentials she should have no trouble finding a job in an area that's more in line with her views.