>>What I read there confirmed my initial response.
re waiting for indictment: if you used the described tactic to evade tax in the USA, you'd be indicted for sure. But FEC is an eccentric beast so lets wait and see... though this one seems more egregious than previous high-profile examples that copped just a fine.
>>Here's one you might have missed:
>>
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/nyregion/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-outfit-designer-criticism.htmlI agree with Melania Trump who told the media to spend as much time on the opoid scourge and efforts to control it as they do on gossip and trivial pieces. Not that I can find any mention of that in NYT...
Similarly, you may not find anything negative in the MSM about AOC, but search on "primary dnc fox" to see how the MSM responds when they like the narrative.
Not sure the DNC understands the precedent it sets there or who they'll be compared to after banning Fox from their 2020 primary coverage. Assuming Fox doesn't seek an overturn in court, CNN is an immediate obvious retaliation after presidential debate questions were fed to HRC's campaign in advance last time, and it will be a lot harder to squall next time Trump un-invites an unruly reporter from his official home if the DNC can veto an entire network. Maybe Trump will be forced to ban CNN completely next time Acosta plays up.
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1