>And, yes, any kind of SQL backend is always better than DBFs.
DBFs still have a place for single-user/local-data utilities and similar scenarios. In those cases it's valuable to not have the installation and runtime overheads of a separate DBMS.
Regards. Al
"Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent." -- Isaac Asimov
"Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right." -- Isaac Asimov
Neither a despot, nor a doormat, be
Every app wants to be a database app when it grows up
