>>>I don't know who Candace is, but having her Facebook account suspended might not be all bad.
>
>Willful ignorance hinting at a premise? Wow.
>
I meant that it might not be bad for Candace.

>>>Regarding reducing black father-absence -
>>>I don't have a clue about it and I think that it's the epitome of arrogance for someone who has never lived that experience to conjecture about "reducing " it.
>
>I've never had cervical cancer so according to you it's the epitome of arrogance to "conjecture" about reducing it? You're adding "experiential" and "ad hominem" fallacies to your "appeal to ignorance" theme and I'm surprised at the source of such cheap illogic.

Cervical cancer and absent black dads? Quite a stretch, John.
Didn't intend an ad hominem slur, sorry if it sounded that way.
My points were:
- I don't have a clue as to why certain women choose to have children out of wedlock with men who will almost certainly not stay around.
It makes no sense to me, but it's a conscious choice and it's rampant, so I'm obviously not on their wavelength.
-it's a bit arrogant to conclude that that behavior is some kind of social pathology because it's different from ours,