Hi

It is much less expensive than RDC it supports access from a web browse, smart phone or remote desktop client. It supports printing via universal printer without installing print drivers or a print server. It can handle a server farm. It has a variety of ways to publish applications. It has additional security features to protect servers from attacks.

Simon

>HI Simon,
>I looked at their website - is it just an RDC replacement or what's the reason to use it? more secure? less licensing fees? does not require an RDC server?
>
>Thanks,
>Albert
>
>>Hi
>>
>>I use TSPlus and it works well and does not require RDS to be installed on the server. It also has a component called RDS Knight to help protect against attacks.
>>
>>>Hi all,
>>>
>>>Working on security stuff again today. I use RDC to log into one of my customer's servers to upload changes/source code etc and test. In discussion with them, they had talked about closing down their RDC server because it "opens a security hole because [they say] when the RDC session is open, then anything from your desktop could find its way to our servers".
>>>
>>>In a way, I can see this (I have not yet checked if AD group policy has options to prevent drive mapping etc - I will look into that later).
>>>
>>>If RDC is not that secure, are there other programs that allow an RDC-like connection where the only thing going back and forth are keyboard/mouse and video? In a sense, the program would open screen into their RDC server but nothing can really pass between my PC and their server other than what I type. I would have to transfer updates via another mechanism but I could tell them that nothing else can move across the wire.
>>>
>>>Albert