>>Again, I would repeat do not follow this path of set relation for a simple update. That just creates a mess.
>
>Thank you for correcting me as far as which cursor should be indexed.
>But you are saying the SET RELATION TO is not necessary and then you use it in your code.
>Am I missing something?

Nope, I am just correcting your code, I am not writing it the way I would write. Actually, set relation to approach would be one of my last choices (even before SQL - UPDATE's support, using xBase). I sent you how would I write it with UPDATE for the second time really.