>>Point I was to make;
>>How come VFP still being part of M$dn distribution is considered such 'risk' and is on a no-go list for corporations.
>>It is M$ product after all, why it has been treated as syphilis ? Who advised them to do so ?
>>VB is somehow ok but VFP no ?
>
>М$ may change, but its policies are forever. And spreading. VFP was an adopted child; VB the less gifted but heir apparent. Guess to whose prom night would Bidža* go?
Mostly agreeing (~80%), but vfp devs arguing for remote dbf as datastore for anything in this century also did vfp a disservice IMO.
Whenever the problems inherent to that approach surfaced, vfp and not the bad practice was blamed...
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only