>>For a while, these antics seemed seem OK because of how useless most "news" had become.

Do you know who drew the extension? NYT, WAPO and the rest can cast insinuations that Trump did it himself, but that's not news.

Earlier this week Trump (himself) posted another official graph from 28 August showing possible storm tracks, many of which did extend into Alabama. Why is this excluded by Fake News? Well, we all know why. Bad Orange Man don't deserve no neutrality. Or fairness. Only the narrative matters.

Today he's posted more, including Alabama National Guard bulletins warning communities to be ready for the storm, plus more early official graphs also showing Alabama affected.

He made his statements on September 1 so the reliance and guffawing on what has happened since, plus one graphic board presented to POTUS in a ciip of him being briefed on the storm, is pretty mean-spirited.

If he were briefly criticized for posting outdated warnings, that would make more sense along with acknowledgment it was not a mean-spirited effort and was easily updated by NHC. Here's a question for you: if given the opportunity to update his warning himself rather than by NHC, do you think he would have?

What would concern me more, is that he's reacted at all to the same mean-spirited attacking that has been non-stop since the Russians gave him the election. As you observed once before, he's a NY real estate dude not afraid that sticks and stones may break his bones, so why react? I'd be careful before rushing gleefully into this apparent breach in his defenses if I were the MSM.